Plus, election deniers think this obscure rule means Trump can decide how votes are counted. ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­    ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­  

Friday, October 9

View in browser
NL-Header_DD-1

By Sally Holtgrieve · Senior Editor, News and Operations

Isn’t it great to end the week with a win for democracy? Today, a federal judge struck down what DOJ called its “list maintenance project,” finding the department violated federal law in its quest to obtain statewide voter data and use it to help states purge the rolls.

In other words, they can’t do that!

 

Marc will talk about this win, election denier Tina Peters’ concerning plan to have the administration grab ballots “as soon as the machine spits them through” and more LIVE today at 6:30 p.m. EDT. Get your questions ready for the chat and join Marc soon.

Icon-Banner_NEWS2

Federal judge shuts down Trump DOJ’s nationwide voter roll crusade, even in states that cooperated

  • A judge ruled the DOJ's policy of collecting states' unredacted voter rolls and urging them to remove voters flagged as ineligible is illegal.

  • The department cannot legally share such data with DHS to run through a federal database to check registrants' citizenship status — even in states that voluntarily handed over their voter rolls, according to the ruling.

  • The judge also strongly rebuked the Trump administration, stating “DOJ cannot run roughshod over longstanding laws that were carefully crafted to protect the rights of the American people.”

➤ Read more about this major ruling

 

Missouri offered to let DOJ inspect its unredacted voter rolls

  • Like many states, Missouri initially refused to give the DOJ a copy of its voter rolls containing sensitive personal information.

  • But records show the state's chief election official later proposed a compromise: let federal officials conduct an "in-person audit" of its voter records.

➤ What the new filings reveal

 

Election deniers say an obscure rule on Wi-Fi routers means Trump can decide how votes are counted. Here’s why they’re wrong

  • An election denier reportedly discussed with the White House a scheme to wrest control of vote counting from states.

  • But the dubious plan, which involves sweeping changes to voting machines and hand counts of ballots, rests on a little-used regulation that covers...WiFi routers.

➤ More about the plot circulating among election deniers

You signed up for this newsletter to get clear, fearless reporting on the legal fights that shape our democracy. Now, take the next step: become a member to keep this work free and accessible for all.

JOIN PREMIUM TODAY

ICE sued for records of its plans for Election Day

  • A pro-voting group sued ICE for failing to respond to FOIA requests regarding the agency's increased involvement in investigating allegations of voter fraud.

  • The lawsuit comes after the group had already submitted multiple FOIA requests seeking documents that disclose those efforts.

➤ More on the lawsuit

 

Despite Trump’s efforts to kneecap it, a key federal election agency is still at work

  • When President Donald Trump fired the independent commissioners of a key federal election agency in July, there was a widespread fear that the move would impact its critical election work before the midterms.

  • Months later, the body has continued much of its work to protect election security.

➤ How the agency is still supporting states

New Jersey voters sue after GOP officials target Democrats for removal

  • New Jersey voters sued Ocean County to stop a GOP-driven purge targeting Democratic and unaffiliated voters ahead of the midterms.

➤ Why the timing is especially consequential

 

In multiple red states, direct democracy is on the ballot this midterm

  • This fall, some voters are being asked to decide the future of direct democracy in red states.

  • Republican lawmakers have been trying to restrict that process to subvert the will of the people. But one voting advocate says fighting for direct democracy "is more important than ever."

➤ Read what’s at stake

Icon-Banner_GOOD-NEWS
Icon-Banner_GOODNEWS-2-3

Voters sue to block Tarrant County, Texas, polling site cuts targeting minority communities

  • The lawsuit accuses Republican officials of intentionally making it harder for Black and Hispanic residents to vote by eliminating dozens of Election Day polling places.

➤ What does the lawsuit say?

Montana court blocks onerous mail voting law that led to thousands of rejected absentee ballots last year

  • The decision is a victory for disability advocates who argued that the requirements increased the likelihood that valid ballots cast by those with difficulty getting to a physical polling place would be rejected on technicalities.

➤ Read about this win for voters

Also in Montana, state Supreme Court strikes down GOP restrictions on citizen ballot initiatives

  • The court invalidated key provisions of a 2023 law that imposed an exorbitant filing fee, barred voters from reconsidering defeated measures for four years and gave lawmakers a formal role in reviewing proposed initiatives before supporters could gather signatures.

➤ Why this is a win for direct democracy

 

GOP bid to scrap Kansas mail ballot grace period fails again

  • In a win for voters, a Kansas appeals court denied the state’s latest request to revive a GOP-backed law that would throw out mail-in ballots received after Election Day, even if they were cast on time.

➤ Why this is a win for voters

 

In win for voters with disabilities, court strikes down California mail ballot rule

  • A federal court struck down a California rule that required voters to return mail ballots by paper and without assistance from others. Plaintiffs argued this requirement is not merely difficult, but disenfranchises voters with disabilities.

  • While the decision is a win for voters, it likely will not affect voting this fall.

➤ More on the win

 

Kentucky’s largest county offers drive-through voting for the first time

  • Voting for some Kentucky residents got easier after Jefferson County announced plans for a vote center with a drive-through option.

  • “This initiative will expand accessibility for residents with disabilities who may struggle to vote at traditional polling locations,” the county clerk said.

➤ Read the full story

Today's newsletter was edited by Andrew Childers and Dave O’Brien, and produced by Leila Fusenig Learn more about our staff here.

Facebook
X
Instagram
Bluesky_Logo-grey (2)
YouTube
Website
TikTok

This is one of our free weekly newsletters. If you were forwarded this email, you can subscribe to our newsletters here. For questions or help with your subscription, please visit our Help Center.

 

Unsubscribe | Manage Preferences | Donate | Billing Portal

 

© Democracy Docket, LLC 2026

250 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 400

Washington, D.C., 20009