Plus, everything you need to know in Missouri’s never-ending redistricting saga. ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­    ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­  

Friday, September 25

View in browser
NL-Header_OTD-4

A note from the editor

We have multiple reporters tracking every movement in the battle over Missouri’s gerrymandered congressional map; covering President Donald Trump’s slew of schemes to control elections; keeping an eye on right-wing extremists…and so much more. Have I ever mentioned we’re busy around here?

 

Overheard in the newsroom as I was putting this together:

HR: “The reporters drink like six cups of coffee a day, we’ll need a bigger coffee machine.”

 

I think that tells you everything. Keeping you informed also fuels us, truly. Thanks for reading!

Sally Holtgrieve · Senior Editor, News and Operations
 
 
REDISTRICTING

Scope of Republicans’ Missouri gerrymander revealed in latest briefs to Supreme Court

By Alexandra Hutzler · Reporter

We've been zeroed in for months now on how Missouri's messy redistricting fight is playing out in the courts, breaking down all the rapid-moving legal developments. But tucked away in filings this week was a stark reminder of the on-the-ground consequences for Americans.

 

More than 1.4 million people would be affected by the gerrymander that Missouri Republicans adopted last year at Trump's request. That's roughly one in three voters statewide who'd shift between old and new districts, all thanks to the GOP's effort to eliminate a single Democratic seat in Kansas City. Missouri’s U.S. House delegation already has six Republicans and two Democrats.

 

The new map would widen that split to 7-1. Across the U.S., a recent Associated Press analysis found that, after Trump launched his nationwide gerrymander war, over 10% of U.S. residents now live in a different congressional district.

 

Which map Missouri will ultimately use this fall is now up to the U.S. Supreme Court, which is set to rule at any moment. (They had not as of press time, 6 p.m. EDT Thursday. You’ll have another email in your inbox with that update if they do.) It's the third time in as many weeks that the justices will weigh in on the matter.

 

Plus, in pushing for their gerrymander, Republicans are making an argument that could vastly expand the power of state lawmakers over the voting process.

➤ The latest in Missouri

In a media landscape full of noise, Democracy Docket cuts through with facts, focus and fearlessness. Join for $120/year and power reporting that holds the line for democracy.

SUPPORT OUR WORK
VOTER RECORDS

Trump administration will use passport data for voter citizenship checks, court filing reveals

By Jim Saksa · Reporter

The administration’s crusade to cobble together citizenship lists out of large data sets continues.

 

In a court filing this week*, the Department of Justice (DOJ) revealed plans to use the State Department’s passport data “for the purpose of verifying… voter eligibility.”

The DOJ filed a vaguely worded status report in Democrats’ ongoing legal challenge against the executive order Trump signed in March, which directed the Department of Homeland Security to work with Social Security Administration records and “other relevant Federal databases” to create lists of every voting-age citizen in each state.

 

The administration’s decision to burn tens of thousands of hours of staff time on hunting down the handful of noncitizens who might be improperly registered to vote has been marked by embarrassing errors and troubling allegations of broken laws and defied court orders. But, along with the government’s other anti-voting steps, it also threatens to create a sense of fear and intimidation around the process, especially for certain communities. The use of passport data may only add to the chilling effect.

 

* Disclosure: The Elias Law Group (ELG) represents plaintiffs in this case. ELG Firm Chair Marc Elias is the founder of Democracy Docket.

BEHIND THE STORY

Sally: How did you uncover this?

Jim: I got this little scoop because, at Democracy Docket, our reporters and Research team are absolutely birddogging election-related litigation. There’s hardly a filing we aren’t reading, just in case it reveals something new. As the election approaches, readers should expect more stories like this one from us.

 ➤ Why this is concerning

ELECTION ADMINISTRATION

Exclusive: EAC commissioner communicated with Cleta Mitchell’s group on proof of citizenship, emails show

By Matt Cohen · Senior Reporter

I can’t tell you how often I’m itching to know what’s going on behind the scenes at the government agencies we cover. Oh, what I would give to be a fly on the wall in the Department of Justice’s voting section, or during the Department of Homeland Security’s election integrity briefings — just to know what kind of shady stuff they’re up to when they think no one’s looking.

 

Wish granted this week when the good folks at Democracy Forward sent us a trove of U.S. Election Commission (EAC) emails unearthed from a FOIA lawsuit.

It did not disappoint.

Buried within the hundreds of emails we received were exchanges between Christy McCormick, the former Republican vice chair of the commission, and Cleta Mitchell’s anti-voting group, the Election Integrity Network (EIN). McCormick was communicating with one of EIN’s leaders about a public comment period from last fall opened by the agency on whether to require documentary proof of citizenship on the federal voter registration form.

Though the saga may well be over — McCormick was allowed to resign this summer amid Trump’s dismantling of the EAC’s leadership — the emails show how a leader of the independent, nonpartisan agency was in touch with some of the most dangerous election deniers working tirelessly to rollback voting rights.

➤ Read the full exclusive

 
 

Odds and ends

➤ California Supreme Court orders GOP sheriff to return seized
ballots, affirms state’s power over local law enforcement


➤ Pennsylvania starts voting under federal scrutiny. Here’s what we’re watching

➤ Top election officials prepare to prevent and prosecute election interference

➤ Appeals court greenlights Ohio GOP’s voter registration proof of citizenship requirement for midterms

➤ ‘Hypocritical’: RNC pushes mail voting for its supporters while attacking it in court

Slack message of the week

Screenshot 2026-09-24 at 4.03.08 PM

What you can do

The reporters you’ve gotten to know here are also on Reddit, sharing behind-the-story looks at their work and answering your questions!

 

You can join the space to discuss our coverage, ask questions about ongoing litigation and follow the legal fights shaping American elections.

 

We look forward to chatting directly with you.

Reddit-graphic_Avatar

QUESTION OF THE WEEK

Would you rather have…

A LONGER EARLY-VOTING PERIOD
MORE POLLING PLACES ON ELECTION DAY

Today's newsletter was edited by Zachary Roth and produced by Leila Fusenig. Learn more about our staff here.

Facebook
X
Instagram
Bluesky_Logo-grey (2)
YouTube
Website
TikTok

This is one of our free weekly newsletters. If you were forwarded this email, you can subscribe to our newsletters here. 

 

Unsubscribe | Manage Preferences

 

Democracy Docket, LLC 

250 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 400

Washington, D.C., 20009